Additive Manufacturing of Composites

Robot-assisted 3D printing


FFF process optimization and uncertainty analysis


Highlights |

  • Experimental study of the uncertainties in bead level dimensional accuracy.
  • Characterization of multi-level mechanical properties and void contents.
  • Optimal process parameters for improved strength and stiffness with higher dimensional accuracy and reduced void contents.
  • Stochastic modeling to predict the process-induced void contents and structural performance.


Fracture toughness analysis of polymer composites

Highlights |

  • Significant improvement in critical stress intensity factor and critical energy release rate were recorded for 5 wt. % CF loading on FFF processed composites.
  • Bead layup sequence, fiber pullout, interfacial de-bonding, and void formation are deemed to be the major factors to the fracture toughness.
  • FFF-based 3D printing is still inferior to conventional manufacturing processes.
  • ​The effect of higher intra-bead voids, microcracks, poor interfacial bonding between fiber and PLA matrix and enlarged intra-bead voids around the fiber surface were critical at higher fiber loading.

Effect of process parameters on AM parts quality

Highlights |

  • A square-shaped nozzle deposited the beads with a square-like cross-section that increased the bead contact surface area and improved the inter-bead bonding with successive beads.
  • Functionalization improved the composite synthesis process that enhanced the fiber-matrix bonding and reduced the tendency of micropore formation at the interface.
  • The FFF-printed part possesses some sort of crystallinity, which is an advantage of the printing process. However, post-processing annealing increased the degree of crystallinity, which enhanced the mechanical properties significantly.

Numerical model of bead spreading architecture

Highlights |

  • VOF-based computational fluid dynamics model was developed with different nozzle geometries to study the free-form melt flow and bead spreading architecture.
  • The phases involved in the numerical model are liquid polymer and air. A laminar, non-Newtonian, and non-isothermal flow is assumed.
  • The governing equations are solved on a regular stationary grid following a transient algorithm.
  • The numerical model yielded a good approximation of the bead cross-section, capturing most of the geometric features of the bead with a reasonable qualitative agreement compared to the experiment.

Thermal and fluid flow model of the polymer FFF process

Highlights |

  • Bead usually maintains the temperature halfway through its cross-section before starting to cool down.
  • The top surface of the bead is always at a higher temperature, which is invariable to the bead location along the spreading direction.
  • The cooling rate is higher at the bottom surface.
  • The longer distance the bead travels means prolonged exposure at a lower temperature, driving the cooling process.